gay – Bruce Llama

The Moonbattery of the Lamestream Snarfle Wife

Bruce — Wed, 11 Jun 2014 22:59:10 +0000

Another day and another Uncle Billy blog. When I read his latest I snorted yoghurt out of my snarfle. Love Lllama had to get the paper lace doilies to clean up.

Consider this caption beneath a pic in the article: “Former Masterchef contestant Sam Gant and wife Celeste prepare for their new venture at South Melbourne Market.” Now for those not in the know, Sam happens to be a woman, a female. So run that by me again! Her wife? And said with a straight face? Puh-leese!

The article refers to her throughout as “Ms Gant”. So what then, pray tell, is her other? And what is Sam? The husband? Another wife? An it? When we totally massacre the institution of marriage, we end up in these idiotic situations. If we can call her partner a wife, we might as well also call her a rock, or a kumquat, or a farglesuvjf.

So, yes, we do refer to the same-sex partner as a wife or a husband, depending on their sex. It’s not hard to understand. How idiotic is that! Oh, and I looked up farglesuvjf – I can’t find it in an English dictionary, it might be Swedish…

We are just making things up as we go along We are just inventing words, and taking older established words, gutting them of their meaning, and adding instead anything we want. This is sheer madness. And even more frustrating is the fact that any media outlet would even succumb to this moonbattery.

Oh such frustrations he has to simply invent words, although I don’t see how calling your female partner a wife is an invented idea. Nor has the word been gutted of its meaning. You know, wife – female spouse. Doesn’t seem too mad to me. Moonbattery on the other hand seems like an invented word.

Just how lobotomised are those in the media today that they simply parrot any PC nonsense as if it were gospel truth.

Lobotomised refers to the act of performing a lobotomy. Isn’t that taking an older established word and gutting it of its meaning?

The mental and moral vacuum found in the lamestream media today is absolutely staggering.

Lamestream? Made up word?

The most important principle we can get out of this is to understand this truth: social engineering is always preceded by verbal engineering.

That’s more or less where I snorted out my snarfle.

By use of euphemisms, half-truths, deception, and by simply making language up as you go along, their job of smashing society becomes so much easier. And the militant homosexualists along with their PC buddies in the mainstream media have perfected all this. So now we can talk about a woman and her wife as if we are talking about 2+2 and what that equals.

Homosexualists? A recently made up word by people who what to simply make up language as you go along. And yes, a woman and her wife is as easy as 1 + 1.

Well, I’m off to polish my snarfle with a damp womble. Have a good day.

Pick Your Own Truth Ignore the Facts!

Bruce — Wed, 11 Jun 2014 10:58:05 +0000

[SOURCE]

Hi!

It’s been awhile, I’ve been busy getting the knots out of my knickers, being hairy has it’s draw backs. I happen to glance up to see Billy talking about truth, I thought, this’ll be good…

Truth-Telling and Homosexuality

The title should be enough to make me stop and go and play some squash. Billy really doesn’t get the concept of truth. Still, let me pull some of his latest truth telling apart for you, after all, it’s good sport.

If ever there was a subject which is almost universally surrounded in falsehoods, deception and misinformation, it is the topic of homosexuality. So powerful is the homosexual juggernaut that very few media outlets are left which will dare to challenge anything it claims.

Actually, take out the word homosexuality and replace it with christianity and you’ve got something closer to the truth.

Not only is the lamestream media pretty much useless here, but the activists have done a great job of taking over the schools, the judiciary, the political sphere, and even the corporate arena. There is almost nothing that takes more courage today, and features more risks, than daring to publicly resist the radical homosexual agenda.

Oh for fuck sake, he sounds just like those Nazis who claimed the jews were taking over the judiciary, the political sphere and even big businesses. Yep, I went there.

Let me cite a few of these recent voices. And sometimes they come from rather unexpected quarters. One very interesting piece recently appeared by a homosexual historian. In it he argues that nobody is ‘born that way,’ and offers a lengthy case to make his point. David Benkof says in conclusion:

Of course, none of this means people don’t have sexual orientations today, it just means sexual orientations are specific to our culture, and thus not basic human nature. In tech-speak, that means being gay is in the software of some people’s lives, but it’s in nobody’s hardware.
The compelling evidence nobody’s born gay doesn’t necessarily have to shred the LGBT agenda. Legitimate reasons for more liberal attitudes and policies regarding gays and lesbians still exist, such as freedom of association, the right to privacy, and respect for other people’s experiences. But those who demand social or political change because gays are born that way just don’t know much about history.

Yes, interesting. David Benkof isn’t saying that gay people don’t exist or that we aren’t gay. He seems to be suggesting that claiming to be born gay isn’t right. Whether or not that’s true should surely be of limited use. He’s saying that our current construct in society of gay and or straight is unique to our society. You should also know that Benkof is a gay orthodox jew who is trying really hard to obey the bible and not have sex with men. He probably thinks that christians are stupid in thinking the messiah has been and gone, and just for the record, Uncle Billy thinks that Benkof is bound for hell as he hasn’t accepted jesus as his lord and saviour. Benkof’s whole article is well worth a read where you’ll find this line:

There weren’t straight people, either. Only our society believes people are oriented in just one direction, as gay history pioneer Jonathan Ned Katz, formerly of Yale, explained in his book The Invention of Heterosexuality.

You don’t see Billy quoting that bit of information, nor would he quote this line:

But scholars don’t think the ancient Greeks had a gay minority. Rather, that civilization thought homosexuality was something anyone could enjoy. In addition to a wife, elite men were expected to take a younger male as an apprentice-lover, with prescribed bedroom roles.

Benkof is not a brave voice or using a great deal of courage. If you took his thoughts to their natural conclusion Billy, sexuality wasn’t a problem in biblical times, therefore whatever the story about Sodom was about, it wasn’t a protest to bum sex.

And also quite revealing is the recent announcement by the Royal College of Psychiatrists that people are not actually born homosexual. Instead, “sexual orientation is determined by a combination of biological and postnatal environmental factors”. Indeed, they even went on to say, “[it] is not the case that sexual orientation is immutable or might not vary to some extent in a person’s life.”

Oh please, even more reason to let people be who they want to. You don’t have to keep your sexual orientation Billy – you too can get some cock into you.

And a lesbian academic has also come out recently saying some very non-PC things about all this. Sex researcher Dr. Lisa Diamond has looked carefully at some of the research on this, and takes a much more nuanced approach than many of the activists and most of the MSM. Her concluding words are these:

1. fluidity in identity, attraction and behavior is NOT specific to women but a general feature of human sexuality, one which is also confirmed by historical and cross-cultural literature;
2. the various sexual categories currently in use (LGBTQI, etc.) are useful heuristics (mental shortcuts, rules of thumb, educated guesses or stereotypes), but though “they have meaning in our culture, … we have to be careful in presuming that they represent natural phenomena” (38:55);
and 3. it is “tricky” to use these categories for advocating rights based on the concept of immutability “now that we know it is not true … As a community, the queers have to stop saying: ‘Please help us, we were born this way and we can’t change’ as an argument for legal standing.”

It’s interesting to note that Dr Diamonds study “Female bisexuality from adolescence to adulthood” suggests that there is “considerable fluidity in bisexual, unlabeled, and lesbian women’s attractions, behaviors, and identities”. So, yes, in one sense I can’t say I was born this way, but at the same time I can say to the likes of Billy – fuck off, if I want sex with men then that’s up to me.

Finally, major study has found what many of have already known: relationship issues are among the main cause of homosexual suicide. As one story begins:

While many assume that family rejection is the leading cause of depression among LBGTI individuals, a new study has found that in fact the problem appears to stem predominantly from the higher incidence of relationship problems among homosexuals. Dr. Delaney Skerrett led a team of researchers from the Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention (AISRAP) in studying suicides in Queensland. He found that a leading cause of suicide among “lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex” (LGBTI) people is stress from their romantic partners.
“We tend to assume that the psychological distress LGBTI people are often going through is due to family rejection. But it seems that’s not so much the case. The conflict seems to be largely related to relationship problems, with partners,” Dr. Skerrett said. In fact, he said, “The numbers are telling us there’s a general acceptance at the family level,” something he said is “great” and “really heartening!”
Instead, the study, which was published on April 2 in Asia Pacific Psychiatry, found that “LGBT individuals experienced relationship problems more often” than heterosexuals, “with relationship conflict also being more frequent than in non?LGBT cases.” That confirms previous studies finding that homosexuals also face higher rates of intimate partner violence than heterosexuals.

It’s not at all clear that this is a major study, in fact, I doubt that it would be considered major. If you read the full paper in question you’ll see that there are a number of cautions in it, and this acknowledgement:

There are certain limitations to this study that need to be acknowledged. The information contained in the QSR is collected chiefly by police officers through interviews with next of kin (NOK) and the accuracy of this is likely to be affected by the grief experienced in the loss of a loved one to suicide. We were also unable to analyze all the social, cultural, and psychological factors that may have been associated with the suicides of the individuals studied, particularly as these may have been unknown to the NOK. What is more, the factors we have been able to identify cannot be claimed to have a causal relationship with the suicidal acts concerned because of the nature of this study, and caution should be exercised in interpreting the results.

Yes, we should be cautious about interpreting the results.

Dissent will be punished

So there we have four different voices taking a rather differing line to the orthodox homosexual mantra. But as I said, those who dare to speak out will often be harshly dealt with.

Nobody has been harshly dealt with because they’ve conducted research or even published their findings or essays. The people who should be harshly dealt with are the fuck-knuckles who cherry pick pieces of information to support their own cause with scant regard to reality.

Nowhere did anyone suggest that gay people should be made straight. The “major study” actually highlights the need for more resources to ensure the ongoing well-being of gay people.

Given the salience of conflict over sexuality in the life events of the LGBT individuals that died by suicide in the present study, self-acceptance and stigma reduction would seem to be important foci to target.

Another fact that Billy likes to overlook.

Consider just one more recent example of this. One expert who dared to warn about the dangerous nature of homosexual activity has lost his job as a result:

He’s a pioneer in the realm of clinical infectious diseases in the Caribbean. And now he’s under fire for testifying that homosexual intercourse is dangerous to those who practice it—and to public health in general. Professor Brendan Bain, a practicing Christian who serves to treat AIDS patients, was the director of the regional coordinating unit of the Caribbean HIV/AIDS Regional Training Network (CHART) at the University of the West Indies in Jamaica, until his anti-gay sex comments caught up with him.

Bain was fired in the wake of fallout related to his testimony on behalf of a group of churches working to keep Belize’s sodomy law in place in 2012. It took two years, but now he’s paying the price for his beliefs. Bain’s testimony was based on his research, which shows the relative risk of contracting HIV is significantly higher among men who have sex with other men (MSM) in Belize than in the general population. His research concludes the same truth in several other countries for which data is available, including countries that have repealed the law that criminalizes anal sex and countries where the law still applies.

Well, that’s one way to interpret it. The University says that it had no issue with Bain having the opinion that he did, but then goes on to say that he has lost the support of the community.

While the university recognizes the right of professor Bain to provide expert testimony in the manner he did, it has become increasingly evident that Professor Bain has lost the confidence and support of a significant sector of the community which the CHART program is expected to reach, including the loss of his leadership status in PANCAP, thereby undermining the ability of this program, to effectively deliver on its mandate. It is for this reason that the University of the West Indies has decided to terminate the contract of Professor Bain as Director of the Regional Coordinating Unit (RCU) of the Caribbean HIV/Training (CHART) Network.

So, yes, he was fired in the wake of the fallout – because he lost the support of those he was supposed to be helping. He was undermining the ability of the program to deliver! In other words, he’s the wrong man for the job.

Yep, speaking the truth can be very costly today, especially when you dare to speak truth about the homosexual lifestyle and agenda. But it is good to see a few brave voices being raised. We need much more of this of course. But it is a good start, and I will continue to publicise it.

Speaking the truth? You don’t want to speak the truth Billy. You only pay attention to the bits that support your position that your god said that gay people should be stoned to death. All of your ‘truth’ is based on that one fairy tale and you continue to pretend to care about others, when all you really care about is stopping progress in the name of your fucked up small-minded arrogant religion.

Grossman asks the questions

Bruce — Fri, 28 Jun 2013 03:28:25 +0000

Miriam Grossman is an MD her little catch phrase is “100% MD, 0% PC.” Nice.

She’s a nutter.

I’ve written about her before. But pretty well she thinks it’s her job to take vulnerable, questioning young people and turn them into heterosexuals. She thinks it’s her job to deny that teenagers should have sex and that the only place to wave people pokers around is in the confines of a marriage.

In one of her latest posts she asks three questions of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), an organisation that is composed of 60,000 primary care paediatricians, paediatric medical subspecialists and paediatric surgical specialists dedicated to the health, safety and well-being of infants, children, adolescents and young adults.

Fair enough that our non-PC MD would want to ask some questions about sexuality and gender identity when dealing with young people. The AAP has just released an updated policy statement on the care for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning youth. Read about it here.

Our good MD asks her questions:

You state that a teen who questions if he is male or female, or who wants his genitalia removed, is “normal, just different.”

Let’s stop you there. Here’s what they say under their recommendations in their policy document:

Pediatricians should be available to answer questions, to correct misinformation, and to provide the context that being LGBTQ is normal, just different.

When it comes to having your bits removed it’s not as easy as fronting up to the doctor and saying I want my junk cut off, in fact they say this:

Supportive counseling is paramount to assist the teenager with any dysphoria and to explore gender roles before altering the body. The therapy consists of potentially delaying puberty with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs, then use of hormonal therapy, and finally surgery.

And they footnote their recommendation with a reference to the World Professional Association for Transgender Health. So I guess you’re statement is right, normal, just different, but they need to correct misinformation. It’s the responsible thing to do.

That was just the opening sentence, now to the first question:

Given the physical differences between male and female are more substantial than between different races, if an African American teen is convinced she is really Caucasian, is she also “normal, just different?” Should her pediatrician affirm her belief, and support her wish for facial surgery and skin bleaching?

I think you’ll find that this isn’t a problem anywhere near the same as sexual identity. Nowhere do we find a family of white people saying to their children, “don’t you grow up black. We’ll disown you.” Nowhere do you hear, “well ok, if you want to marry a black she’ll need to have her face bleached. We’ll lend you the money.” And tell me Dr. MD with 0PC, how does a white woman come up with an idea that a teenage black teen wants to be white?

On to question two.

2. If my son thinks he’s a girl, you recommend I find a therapist who will respect and affirm his belief.

But if my son is attracted to boys, and his urges feel foreign and distressing, you advise me to find a therapist who will tell him “this is who you are, accept it.”

Honestly, does that make sense?

I couldn’t find the quote “this is who you are, accept it” anywhere in the documentation. Perhaps you’re just making a quote up? What I do find are words like this:

Homophobia and heterosexism may damage the emerging self-image of an LGBTQ adolescent. Homophobia perceived by LGBTQ youth may lead to self-destructive behaviors

I think it may be best to discover why his urges feel foreign and distressing.

And this:

Another critically important role of the pediatrician is to assist parents of sexual minority youth. Pediatricians should acknowledge the parents’ feelings but should provide information and support for the adolescent who has disclosed. Parents’ reactions and attitudes may adjust over time.

and:

Many adolescents struggle with their sexual attractions and identity formation, and some may be referred to as “questioning.”

and:

If a pediatrician does not feel competent to provide specialized care for sexual minority teenagers and their families, he or she has the responsibility to evaluate families and then refer for medically appropriate care.

So nowhere is there a suggestion that a young gay or questioning man should just accept it. In answer to your question, “honestly, does that make sense” the answer is no. Your question is wrong.

Perhaps our MD hasn’t enough time to read the 8 page policy document, page 1 is a cover page, pages 6, 7 and 8 are footnotes, so really, just read pages 2 through to 5. Only takes a couple of minutes and all your questions would be answered.

Exodus closes down makes christians void

Bruce — Sat, 22 Jun 2013 03:50:30 +0000

One of the big players in the ‘Pray the gay away’ society of homophobic bigots is closing its doors.

Exodus International, the oldest and largest Christian ministry dealing with faith and homosexuality announced tonight that it’s closing its doors after three-plus decades of ministry. The Board of Directors reached a decision after a year of dialogue and pray

It seems that they don’t think they can pray the gay away any more. The president of Exodus made a full apology to all those that have suffered because of the programs of Exodus.

I am sorry for the pain and hurt that many of you have experienced. I am sorry some of you spent years working through the shame and guilt when your attractions didn’t change. I am sorry we promoted sexual orientation change efforts and reparative theories about sexual orientation that stigmatized parents.

This is a significant change. This is what shiny llama’s like myself have said for a long time. Gay? So what. Don’t try and pretend to be straight it doesn’t work.

Of course, our regular contributors to the jesus camp of love by bigotry have been quick to say just how outrageous it is.

Me old mate Spinksy has this to say:

In the end perhaps it is a good thing that Exodus International has now closed. With people like Chambers and Whitten at the helm there was bound to be a lot more destruction on the way. As the final reason why Chambers made the decision he claimed that it was the culture’s changing attitudes to homosexuality that called for the organisation to finish up. Again Chambers shows a complete lack of biblical discernment and a disdain for truth in the face of opposition.

Hahaha, that’s so funny. Spinksy is talking about a disdain for the truth? He finishes with a wonderfully worded last sentence

We need to be prayerful that another organisation, and Scripture-compelled Christians, be ready to fill the rapidly distorted void that has been left by Exodus International.

He wants another organisation to fill the distorted void? It’s nice that at last he sees just how distorted his void really is. I’m not surprised, the amount of crap that comes out of his void would distort anything. At least while he’s busy praying his not bothering other people. He and his void should spend more time on all fours praying to the distortion.

And what of Uncle Billy?

Homosexuals will continue to find liberation and restoration by the mighty power of the risen Christ. Forget what the MSM and the militants are saying: Christ came to set the captives free, and he is in the business of turning lives around. He has been doing it for 2000 years now.

Seriously? You lot have prayed for world peace for 2000 years, how’s that working out? Can you point to just where your christ thing has set anyone free? Which lives has he turned around? How easy is it to simply ignore those that study the area of sexuality.

I know many of these people. They were once deep into the homosexual lifestyle, but by repentance, faith, and the grace of God, they have been made new creations in Christ. Their very existence puts lie to the claims of the activists that change is impossible.

Which people is it that you know Uncle Billy? The very existence of people who say organisations like Exodus do not help and in fact cause great harm should show you that the claim that it works is a lie. Get your head out of your own arse. Perhaps that arse is the same distorted void that Spinksy seems to be in.

Change is indeed possible, and it happens all the time. God bless all the ex-homosexual ministries that have remained true to Christ, to God’s Word, and the power of the Holy Spirit to radically change lives. They are doing tremendous work, as countless former homosexuals can attest to.

Change is of course possible and it does happen all the time. Whether or not some gay guys become straight is a moot point. There’s actually nothing wrong with being gay. There’s no basis for your claim dear Billy that there are countless former homosexuals. It’s another of your rather odd assertions that you use to simply bolster your own arrogance that you alone know the truth.

Be sure to check out Bill Muehlenberg: Bullying and lying for Jesus blog for a very good read on Uncle Billy’s hatred of all things non-heterosexual.

Then there is the wonderfully deluded Sacerdotus. He thinks that the catholics are always right. No matter what.

In any event, I applaud Chambers for apologizing and showing true concern for the LGBT people. It takes a lot of humility to do this. However, homosexual behavior is still sinful and dangerous for those who practice it. We must find an effective pastoral way to work with homosexuals and help them live God’s will without them feeling any burden or stigma.

He has the audacity to talk about finding a way to ‘work with homosexuals’ so that they don’t feel any burden or stigma. But before you think how wonderful that is the preceding sentence sinks his goodwill and shows just how harmful religious people are. Telling me, telling gay people that we are sinful and that my sexuality is dangerous because I ‘practice’ it is to apply a stigma and a burden.

Exodus International is a delightful example of what should be happening to religious organisations that attempt to tell others how sinful they are. A bit of self-reflection and honesty would show just how fraught and dangerous religious extremists are. They have no interest in helping people, their only interest is in the preservation of their narrow view of the world based on their lies of there being a supernatural being.

Here’s a whole galaxy, so far removed from us that we will never get there. Do you know how much this galaxy cares where you put your willy?

Jago is Unnatural

Bruce — Wed, 19 Sep 2012 06:05:31 +0000

[SOURCE]

Arnold Jago is a doctor who really should know better. Â I’ve passed comments about him before

The reasons why homosexual acts are wrong are not primarily to do with statistics or survival rates.
The issue is a moral one.

Really? Â Based on what? Â Who gets hurt in a consensual homosexual act? Â Nobody. Â What’s immoral about that?

Is it or is it not contrary to natural law to engage in anal and/or oral sex?
That is the question that matters.

Obviously it isn’t contrary to any natural law, because we’re doing it.

What is contrary to natural law is, by definition, bad for people as people.

Seriously? Â Hearing aids? Â Glasses? Artificial limbs? Â Medication? Â Pain killers? Â Are all those man-made things contrary to the natural law by definition?

The job of a caring society is to find ways to discourage unnatural practices without being uncharitable about it.

How is gay sex unnatural? Â How?

There is nothing charitable about asking anyone to curb their natural inclinations, that’s simply unjust and unfair Arny Sweetie.

Arnold Jago shows us his love

Bruce — Mon, 23 Jul 2012 01:12:16 +0000

[SOURCE]

Arnie “Sweetie” Jago

Arnold Jago is a doctor from Mildura, which is in North West Victoria.

He’s one of those catholics that think theÂ InquisitionÂ was a pretty good idea and we should do it again.

He runs a website called The Real Mary MacKillop and has even written a book about Mary Fucking MacKillop.

Part of the MFM site is his blog, where he loves to suck up to popes and priests. Â He’s latest offering:

160-plus members of the National Council of Priests of Australia are in Warrnambool for a convention.

Let’s hope that the convention covers how to handle the abuse of children and the cover up of the church.

A guest speaker is â€œoutspokenâ€ British priest, Father Timothy Radcliffe.
Fr Radcliffe is in trouble with the Pope.
Why?
Here is a quote from one of his addresses:
â€œWe begin by standing by gay people, as they hear the voice of the Lord that summons them to a life of happiness. We accompany them as they wrestle with discovering what this means and how they should walk etc.â€
Standing by? Accompanying them as they wrestle? What is he talking about?

You know, Arnie baby, he’s talking about letting people know that it’s ok to be gay. Â He’s helping them over come the religious bigotry that exists and that people like you continue to perpetuate.

If the Catholic Priests of Australia really love people with same-sex attractions â€“ with a selfless love as Godâ€™s children â€” why not tell them the truth?

The truth that their god created them gay perhaps? Â The truth that they were created in his image?

Why not remind them that the Church has always taught that homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered, contrary to Natural Law, under no circumstances to be approved?

Oh, yeah, that’s love. Â Let’s throw out all the good science and instead rely on the ramblings of an old virgin because that’s how you show love. Â Calling people disordered and against nature is a sure way to build up theÂ confidenceÂ in gay people. Â The church is clearly wrong on this. Â Time to grow up Arnie honey.

If priests instead condone homosexual acts and same-sex â€œmarriageâ€ â€” giving their blessing to public commitments to a lifetime of disordered activityâ€”are they truly Catholic?

Priests seem to condone child abuse, are happy to cover up for their fellow ministers, but instead you want to talk about condoning homosexual acts, and not in a good way. Â Instead you focus on a perfectly natural expression of people’s sexuality by calling it disordered. Â It’s time that priests and the faithful asked the question Arnie sweetie, if the catholic church is wrong (and it is) on matters of sexuality, what’s the point in being catholic?

Time to give it up.

More on Billys Book

Bruce — Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:07:11 +0000

[SOURCE]

In fact, I predicted last year what the truth-haters would do when my new book appeared: they would deny it, and then, attack it. My thoroughly-documented book on homosexuality,Â Strained Relations, complete with 707 footnotes, is being treated exactly as I said it would be.

Oh yawn.

Billy, billy, billy, you said:

They will go ballistic, and will basically seek to shoot the messenger. Instead of dealing with all of the data and evidence I present here, they will simply attack me big time. If I thought I was getting a lot of hate mail and death threats already, just wait and see what lies ahead.

And guess what, nobody has gone ballistic. Â Let’s face it, your book is irrelevant and has simply been ignored. Â That must really hurt.

Not only did the original print run sell out in the first nine weeks, so that a second print run is now available, but various outlets which are not dominated by PC considerations and fear of the homosexual militants have been promoting the volume.

Various outlets not dominated by PC will be christian bookstores. Â Hardly the home of the blockbuster book. Â (yes, yes, everyone sells bibles, not the same thing). Â How many was the first print run billy the author? Â 500? Â 1,000? Â How many? Â How many have you actually sold? Â How many did you give away? Â Not many would be my guess.

Just last week I did an hour-long interview with a national-wide radio program about the book. It occurred because the interviewer happened to be a Christian who had the courage to want to see truth exposed in the public arena. So despite the MSM and homosexual blackout, the word is getting out anyway.

So, what sort of radio station would do an hour-long interview with the author of a small run book that has no impact on society at all? Â My guess is that it was 20/Twenty on Vision FM. Â Vision FM is indeed a national network of christian radio stations, with over 500 stations relaying their broadcasts. Â Of course, the only way to pick them up is to stand on the roof with an antenna pointed to the low powered transmitter. Â If you happen to live next door to the transmission tower you’d probably be able to pick it up. Â Hardly what I’d call the public arena.

But when the truth can no longer be quarantined and censored out, then the second strategy will be all-out attack. Once it becomes impossible to keep a lid on this book, then the attack dogs will be unleashed to do their vicious hatchet jobs.

OK, this should be fun. Â I wonder how long we have to wait for the lid to pop off and just who will release the attack dogs. Â Smithers no doubt.

Poor Billy delivers another attempt to drum up some support for his largely ignored book, he even lets some negative comments in on his blog post, probably in some vague hope of drumming up a bit more business.

There’s no substance to Billy the author. Â He doesn’t provide the facts and figures, he won’t even mention the radio station. Â He’s keen to point out how well his book is researched, it has footnotes and everything, Â yet heÂ demonstratesÂ that he will only deal with facts when they support his view.

Bleating Bill

Bruce — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 01:12:34 +0000

[SOURCE]

Bill is bleating. Â Bleeding heck. You know that Bill Has A Book, it’s all about The Gays. Â When Billy Babes released his Book, in his original post about it he made this brave prediction about how The Gays would respond:

They will go ballistic, and will basically seek to shoot the messenger. Instead of dealing with all of the data and evidence I present here, they will simply attack me big time. If I thought I was getting a lot of hate mail and death threats already, just wait and see what lies ahead.

So confident was he of this, he boasted:

Â Yet I can already predict how the other side will respond to all this. Indeed, I will put good money on this.

But, what about the Main Stream Media Billy Boy?

And the MSM, well, we know they will have only two possible responses. They will probably just ignore the book altogether. This is a favourite tactic of the MSM. This silence effectively censors any point of view it disagrees with. By refusing to even mention this book, that is one good way of covering the public with a blanket of censorship.

The other option of course will be for the MSM to mercilessly attack me and the book. Indeed, I can already imagine the various hostile reviews the MSM will feature. I will in fact be very much surprised if just one favourable review appears anywhere in the Australian MSM.

Billy is really good with his predictions! Â He wants it both ways, but predictions they are.

In his recent post Billy Butterfly then makes this statement:

As I wrote before my new book was published, there would be a complete silence concerning my book as well:Â www.billmuehlenberg.com/2011/09/04/strained-relations/

That certainly has been the case: absolutely not a peep out of the MSM or even the homosexual lobby. This is a deliberate strategy of censorship: simply ignore the book and its evidence altogether, and hope that it just quietly goes away.

So, prediction was that the ‘homosexual lobby’ was going to ‘go ballistic’. Â That the homosexual lobby would attack him big time. Â If he thought he was getting a lot of hate mail and death threats before, just wait and see what lies ahead. Â The MSM has not attacked him, there have been no hostile reviews (there are reviews on websites, but mostly christian and hardly worth noting) and the ‘homosexual lobby’ don’t give a single malt sour milkshake about his book.

And why? Â Because there is a deliberate ‘strategyÂ of censorship.’… or…. the book is simply ignored because it’s written by a fundamentalist christian who has no credibility, because his basic premise for writingÂ the book is flawed. Â The flaw is that he accepts the bible view that homosexuality is anÂ abomination, and that equality should be denied because his thinks his god made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.

Billy goes on in his ramblings to then lambasteÂ the MSM for not reporting that Peter RoebuckÂ , who committed suicide recently, did so after he was questioned by police about sexualÂ assault. Â Billy Bullshitter suggest, no says, that Roebuck was aÂ pedophile

I refer to those cases of when adult men are caught out with having sex with boys. This is nothing other than homosexual pedophilia and child abuse, but the MSM seems to have sworn a vow of silence on this one. Of course there are a few exceptions. If it turns out this activity has taken place in a church setting, then it is front page news.

Consider the Australian case of a recently deceased sports broadcaster. It seems he committed suicide because he was caught out having sex with some African boys. One of the few journalists to have the guts to actually report on this is Andrew Bolt.

As far as I can tell, the reason for Roebuck’s demise has been well and truly reported across the main stream. Â Perhaps not straight away, but there is no censorship here. Â The full story is there in plenty of detail. Â You have to remember that Roebuck was quiet well thought of in sporting circles, there was no attempt to hide the news, but it seems to me there was an attempt to check the story properly before leaping to conclusions. Â Perhaps something that Billy the Badger could adopt.

It’s nothing for someone like Billy to simply make shit up to fit his own radical, hateful agenda. Â Roebuck was questioned over the sexualÂ assaultÂ of a 26 year old man. Â Not a boy. Â He was not caught out having sex with some African boys. Â He was once jailed for caning the bottoms of some 19 year old men, not boys, men.

I have no idea who Roebuck was. Â Nor do I care. Â There is no reason for sexual assault, whether its against minors or adults. Â To force people, to rape, to assault is always wrong. Â For Batshit Billy to suggest that there is a cover up shows the level he will sink to in an attempt to make his point that all homosexuals are pedophiles, and therefore evil.

Could we expect a retraction from Billy? Â Not a hope. Â He will never accept the evidence, nor admit that he was wrong. Â And why? Â Because he wrote about The Gays, therefore they are evil and therefore he must be right. Â The Gays are after all out to get him and silence him.

I predicted:

I rather suspect weâ€™ll just roll our eyes oh billy boy, while you wait for the controversy to drive your sales.

Bill:0 Llama:1

Backside Invasion

Bruce — Sun, 15 May 2011 01:55:30 +0000

[SOURCE]

I laughed so much at this that I just had to cut and paste it and then pass lots of silly comments about it. Â I really wonder at the brain capacity of some people. Â It surprises me that there is enough of it to co-ordinate fingers to keys.

As Christians, the horrors of homosexuality remind us of our humanity and the great demands that God asks of us.

Horrors?

We must remember that one day we will sit before the judgment seat and our worst acts will be brought to the fore. We will also be asked to account for our fellow man, our brothers and our fathers, our sons and our fellow Americans. One recalls that moment when God asked Cain about Abel, and Cainâ€™s fateful reply, â€œAm I my brotherâ€™s keeper?â€ Now more than ever we need to be the best brothersâ€™ keepers we can be.

So now, for you to get into heaven you have to be responsible for other people’s ‘sins’? Â And salvation is only for Americans?

Within this perplexing set of spiritual responsibilities,

I snorted when I read that!

it is vital that we fight vigilantly against the worst humanitarian disasters surrounding us. To do this, we need to educate ourselves. Sometimes this is difficult. Sometimes this is a realm only for the strong and mature. As we here today take a step into an offensive and demeaning corner of homosexual activity, I can earnestly say that now is one of those moments.

Humanitarian disasters are the human tragedy after an earthquake or a tsunami, people having sex that you don’t approve of is not a disaster. Â You know you don’t have to peek around the corner don’t you? Â There really is no need for you to look.

Sodomy. It is a vile word.

It is, please don’t use it, it’s a made up christian word.

God justly describes it as in an â€œabominationâ€ worthy of destruction in both Genesis and Ezekiel.

And yet it was your god that put plump lovely buttocks and huge hairy dicks together and made backside invasion possible! Â You should try it.

Medically, human sodomy is defined as penetration of the human anus by a foreign object.

Medically? Â I think you mean religiously. Â Medically,if they have a term, I think they use anal intercourse.

For homosexuals, this means one male inserts his erect phallus between the buttocks of another male and inserts it quite deeply.

Oh, a size queen!

He will then proceed to pull his member almost all the way out before violently poking it back in again.

Violently – that’s probably rape, although some guys do like it a bit hard. Â What you’re describing here is anal intercourse. Â You could have just said that, everyone understands that anal intercourse means fucking.

This rectal trespass causes indescribable pain.

Then you’re not doing it properly.

Pharmacy products and even saliva can be used to lubricate the robust activity, although many gays prefer to go without for that â€œrough and nastyâ€ feeling.

You can get lube in the supermarket, it’s probably a bit cheaper. Â Sounds like you might like it a bit rough and nasty, you kinky man you.

Within the homosexual element, there is a group called the â€œpower bottomers.â€

There is? Â I’ll add it to the list, under “power front bottomers”

The power bottomer is not just an expert at sodomy; he is singularly dedicated to this sexual assault and will entertain no other. Simply put, it is the only way he will achieve ejaculatory gratification.

Ok, your language is very odd. Â It’s not sexual assault if it’s consensual. Â And so what if it’s the only way someone can get to orgasm.

Recently, power bottoming has moved out of the shadows from a perverse psychological dilemma to aÂ full-blown cultural trend with shamelessly vocal adherents.

What he means is that he read an article on-line about it. Â The ‘perverse psychological dilemma’ is really about finding a complementary partner. Â If you like to take cock, you want to find someone who is happy to give you cock. Â No point two bottoms going out if you’re just after sex.

These types of sodomites delight in their lack of carnal dimensionality and spend much of theirÂ free time seeking out a mate who can balance their â€œqueerâ€ equation.

They do? Â You mean they search for suitable sexual partners on line – just like straight people do?

The homosexual will exhibit himself in three basic positions for power bottoming:

You’re very well researched.

â€¢ Standing against a wall with oneâ€™s exposed buttocks swaying out. This is most often employed in public restrooms and gym showers.

Experienced are you?

â€¢ Kneeling face down with oneâ€™s hands on the floor and the glutinous maximums gesturing upwards. Convenient for abandoned warehouses and private sadomasochistic â€œdungeons.â€

LOL – you know some women do that too. Â Oh, and we even do it at home!

â€¢ Lying on oneâ€™s back with hind legs in the air. Most often occurring in a domestic setting (such as the bedroom), this posture allows for the deepest form of homosexual penetration.

Hind legs? Â As opposed to fore legs? Â Perhaps you’re really intoÂ bestiality. What’s ‘homosexual penetration’? Tried it? Â Was he too big for you?

In urban homosexual vernacular, the male penetrator may be a â€œtotal topâ€ or â€œ100% top.â€ â€œVersatile,â€ another expression in this lexicon of filth, is gay code for a man who pretends to be a well-endowed penetrator in public, but readily begs to be the recipient of sodomy in the bedroom or alleyway.

Alleyway? Â Yes, yes, we are top or bottom and if we like it both ways we’re versatile, it’s a really practical way to find out who you’re getting into bed with rather than wait and be disappointed. Â Versatile does not mean you’re lying – you just read that in one article about one man.

Any hint that a potential partner is a â€œversatileâ€ will scare off a power bottom on the hunt, and he will move deeper into the bushes of a public park or on to the urinals at the local disco to seek his prey.

He moves deeper into the bushes? Â Is that where the power tops are hiding these days. Â Just as well you told us!

Although leaders of the homosexual community would be loath to admit it, the gay male penetrator top is quite elusive.

Umm… no. Â Just coz you can’t get a root doesn’t mean there aren’t any tops around, it just means you’re a sloppy bottom and probably ugly to boot. Â Remind me, who are the leaders of the homosexual community?

Attempting to classify him by clothing/body/character types is next to impossible. Because of his rarity, the phrase â€œpower topâ€ has no credibility in gay slang.

You really are making this up as you go along, aren’t you.

Experts have noted that the power bottom has changed the traditional submissive/dominant dynamic of the homosexual copulation ritual.

Your experts are christian fundamentalists who lie for a living.

In this new environment, the bottom takes on the role of theÂ aggressor/hunter, prowling leather bars and anonymous wesbites for a most vigorous backside invasion possible.

Ha! backside invasion… adding that to my list of descriptions of sex. Â And, I’ve already used it! Â Thanks.

The top penetrator is submissive in this delicate game, letting the â€œbossy bottomâ€ purchase him expensive cocktails and pay carfare.

I see, so you’re sick of having to pay the bill?

They may wear specially colored scarves and exhibit chest hair to communicate what role they intend to play in this disgusting, fast-paced action.

Hang on, you just said it’s impossible to classify a top by his clothing/body/character type.

Most often, the bottom can be identified by his bearded face, sarcastic flippancy and very tight slacks (to show off the buoyancy of his buttocks).

I think you’ve stumbled into a Bear bar – careful, someone will eat you up!

The power bottom is unrepentant about his effeminate behavior, eschewing any discussion of the immorality of anal violation. This is not to say this type is quiet. Indeed, most are overly loquacious during a physical encounter, cooing then demanding, snarling and then shouting. One clinician has likened it to bearing witness to a veritable convention of Touretteâ€™s sufferers, a shower of relentless profanity and human fluids that sickens as well as fascinates.

The clinician probably needs to find a new boyfriend, he’s current shag sounds unstable and girly.

Over time, the power bottom will come to be defined by his rectum.

His rectum has a name? Perhaps you mean people call him ‘asshole’.

His anus will become a sort of personal occultic shrine, a thing he cares for constantly, pampering it with talc, deep cleaning its pipes and even whitening its ruddiness through medical procedures (see my report onÂ anal bleaching).

Yes, some men like to keep their bottoms clean. Â Some women too, I suspect. Â Don’t you wipe your arse?

He will spend night and day thinking of the reproductive organs of his past and future conquests, memorizing girth and length, curvature and angularity, foreskin and stamina.

Yeah, men. Â They think about sex a lot. Â Seems you’ve got a few good memories to fall back on now you can’t find a top. Â That should help as you stroke your phallus.

He will view illicit pornographic films and linger in public toilets.

There’s toilets that show porn? Â Where.

As this sad predilection overtakes him, family and friends will be cast aside as he seeks out even larger phalluses to fulfill his accursed needs.

You’re projecting again, dear.

And each and every time he sits down, whether it be at the office or church, he will think of the foulest acts of sex.

Men do that, they think about how good it is to spray.

When broken down by race, ethnobiologists have found that the vast majority of power bottoms are Caucasian or light-skinned Latins.

Really? Â Perhaps they need to get out of New York or LA.

Whether because of hereditary endowment or social stigma, many blacks prefer the role of penetrator.

Yeah, that’d be because they’ve got big dicks. Â Everyone knows that.

Few studies have been done on the significance of anal sex among Asian homosexual males, though anecdotal evidence suggests it is quite rare.

You should visit a few twink bars baby. Â Plenty of Asians there wanting cock.

This is surprising, given the fact that Asian heterosexual females engage in sodomistic intercourse far more often than their white female counterparts.

You’re an expert on everything aren’t you! Â I bet you live in a high rise and spend your day peeping into other buildings with a high powered telescope.

This statistical anomaly could be explained by the fact that a growing number of white male/Asian female couples exist and that they have been introduced to the act of anal intimacy through atheism and transsexual pornography.

I’m sure if there was such an anomaly you could explain it like that, probably you’d find a proper scientific study would prove your hypothosis wrong, but that’s what science does. But you probably don’t want to know that.

The number of white males who are sodomizing Asian females may also account for the large number of white males being sodomized in male-on-male encounters, for there is a strong overlap of white males who date Asian females and white males who pursue homosexual acts.

Where are you getting this rubbish from?

Indeed, ethnographers have not yet classified the white male who is characterized by this dualistic natureâ€“ appearing publicly with Asian women and privately being anally raped by groups of Latin or black males.

You’re really serious aren’t you. Â You do understand that if it’s private and consensual it’s not rape. Â And groups of latin or blacks? Â Wow.

Experience has shown, however, that this growing subset of the American population may pose moral and societal risks for future generations and it is vital that todayâ€™s Christians take note of this outrageous trend.

You seem to have a lot of experience. Â Just because you can read a few articles doesn’t make it the ‘norm’ any more than a Hollywood film is based on reality. Â Now, get on to Manhunt and change “Versatile” to “Bottom” and buy some lube.

Update:

A little more research shows Christwire to be a satrical website. Â I hate that it’s getting so hard to tell the real christiansÂ from the fake christians! Â That explains why I was laughing so much! Nicely done!

Wild Assertions

Bruce — Sun, 10 Apr 2011 03:02:07 +0000

Bill the Mule of Burg, often amuses me with his outlandish statements and ignorance to anything outside his experience. Â He still thinks that homosexuality is a lifestyle. Â Well damn it, I want my lifestyle too – some place nice, with a view of the ocean in the evenings and a view of mountains in the morning. Â I want a houseboy to bring me a gin and tonic at 5.00 p.m. and peel grapes for me. Â Wow, now that’s a lifestyle!

I just love this quote in his latest outrage –

Any wild assertion will do. Donâ€™t worry about proof, or evidence, or even common sense. Just throw out a wild accusation, repeat it often enough â€“ of course with the help of a brainless media â€“ and before you know it, it has become established historical fact.

He’s talking about this story, but it would be really useful if he’d spend a few minutes thinking about that.

He’s big on social engineering. Â That’d be what his religion is for, the ultimate force in the world to engineer society just the way a bunch ofÂ decrepitÂ old men want it to be. Â I’d sooner listen to a bunch ofÂ scientistÂ suggest a theory with good reason than some religiousÂ nut-jobÂ sprout about how wrong they must be based on nothing more than his rather misguided assumption that nobody is gay, at all, ever. Â (And there’s another of his wild assertions).

gay – Bruce Llama

The Moonbattery of the Lamestream Snarfle Wife

Related Posts

Pick Your Own Truth Ignore the Facts!

Related Posts

Grossman asks the questions

Related Posts

Exodus closes down makes christians void

Related Posts

Jago is Unnatural

Related Posts

Arnold Jago shows us his love

Related Posts

More on Billys Book

Related Posts

Bleating Bill

Related Posts

Backside Invasion

Related Posts

Wild Assertions

Related Posts